Sizing Agent
Scores a candidate asset against the five sizing rubric factors from the evidence supplied, produces a draft band with the reasoning for each factor, and flags where evidence is missing rather than assuming a score. The funding decision stays with the strategy forum.
An agent gathers the evidence, applies the rule, scores the case and recommends an outcome. A named human decides and the decision is recorded against them.
- Acts for
- Marketplace Operator
- Action class
- advisory
- Decisions / 30d
- 9
- Overturned by a human
- 11%
Memory
Retains scorecards for comparables; purged when the asset is retired.
Safe state
Stops scoring and returns the case with the factors it could not evidence when more than two factors lack evidence.
Reviewer time per case: 15 min with this agent, 90 without.
Tools
- Sizing rubric (five factors)
- Evidence bundle reader
- Comparable-asset index
- Scorecard writer
Data access scope
- Read-only: candidate submissions and their evidence
- Read-only: scorecards of previously banded assets
- Write: draft scorecards marked as agent-prepared
Guardrails
- Every factor score cites the evidence it rests on; a factor without evidence is scored as missing, never estimated
- Cannot move a band once a human has confirmed it
- Draft bands are never shown as final to the submitting entity
Human-in-the-loop
- MCIT strategy forum confirms the band and commits funding
Orchestration
Every tool call is scoped by the declared data access above; the orchestrator cannot reach systems outside it. Owning entity: MCIT.
Live demo run
Watch the agent execute a real scenario step by step, every tool call, validation, and human checkpoint is traced and auditable. Typical run: ~5.6s.
Owning entity
Updated 2026-07-21. Run traces retained 24 months for audit under the platform governance policy.
Community · 0 threads
Questions, findings and requests from the entities that use this asset. Owners reply here; threads with upvotes surface to the owning entity's inbox.